Legal Opinion

Miller v. Miller

California Supreme Court

Decided October 19, 1892No. 14109PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtGarotjtte, J.

—This is an action to quiet title, and an appeal is before us from the judgment, upon a bill of exceptions. Appellants introduced their tax deed in evidence and rested, insisting that such deed established a prima facie title in them. We are unable to see that respondents’ evidence was material to the case in any degree, and consequently we have nothing before us for consideration upon the question of title save the tax deed of appellants. In viewing a tax deed from a common-law stand-point, the author of Blackwell on Tax Titles, at section 845, says: “This deed, according to the principles…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Rollins v. WrightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Wilson v. McKennaIllinois Supreme Court · 1869
  3. Landregan v. PeppinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Hughes v. CannedyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Holbrook v. FellowsIllinois Supreme Court · 1865

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Cullen v. Western Mortgage & Warranty Title Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Johnson v. TaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Modern Heat & Power Co. v. Bishop Steamotor Corp.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1948
  4. Johnson v. CantyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Henderson v. LangleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API