Legal Opinion

Landregan v. Peppin

California Supreme Court

Decided October 1, 1890No. 13526PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Plumas County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Foote, C.

— This action is brought to quiet title to a certain piece of land in Plumas County. The court below rendered judgment as prayed for, from which, and an order refusing a new trial, the defendant takes this appeal. From the record it appears that in the year 1881 William Minto obtained the land by deed of conveyance from one Ward; that Minto afterwards, in January, 1886, made a deed of it to certain parties, which conveyance was not placed upon record until September, 1886. Through mesne conveyances from these parties the plaintiff claimed title. Since about March, 1887, the defendant…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Frisbie v. MooreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1876

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Bates v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Chapman v. JocelynCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  3. People v. SachauCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
  4. Cobban v. HindsMontana Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Miller v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API