Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Canty

California Supreme Court

Decided March 25, 1912No. S.F. No. 5738PublishedCited by 14 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Fresno County and from an order refusing a new trial. George E. Church, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiff and from an order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial in an action brought by plaintiff to quiet his alleged title to certain lands in Fresno County. The action was commenced May 12,1909. The complaint contained in addition to the general allegations ordinarily used in such complaints, allegations substantially as follows: On May 7, 1909, plaintiff tendered and offered to pay to defendant one hundred and fifty dollars and such further sums as defendant may have expended in the matter of the payment of taxes and other encumbrances…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Holland v. HotchkissCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Buck v. CantyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  3. In Re the Estate & Guardianship of EikerenkotterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Johnson v. TaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  5. In Re Estate of SchandoneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Cullen v. Western Mortgage & Warranty Title Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Stevens v. TorreganoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  3. Imperial Land Co. v. Imperial Irr. Dist.California Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Wood v. RoachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  5. Smart v. PeekCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API