Legal Opinion

Henderson v. Langley

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 25, 1935No. 19702PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McNEILL, O. J.

This is an action to quiet title.

The original petition followed the usual statutory form of an action in ejectment and to quiet title. Three of the defendants filed a disclaimer, and then plaintiff filed a supplemental petition against the remaining defendant, L. M. Langley, alleging a cause of action which sought to quiet title to the premises in question.

Plaintiff alleged in substance that she, at all times, had been the owner of the land tn question since its selection as her allotment ; that she became possessed of the same after said defendants had filed said disclaimer;…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Lind v. StubblefieldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  2. Cullen v. Western Mortgage & Warranty Title Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Johnson v. TaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Harris v. DefenbaughSupreme Court of Kansas · 1910
  5. Horsky v. McKennanMontana Supreme Court · 1916

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Welborn v. WhitneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  2. Price v. MahoneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  3. Wilcox v. WesterheideSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
  4. McAfee v. HardenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  5. Westerheide v. WilcoxSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API