Legal Opinion

Halek v. City of St. Paul

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 28, 1949No. 34,611PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Peterson, Justice.

Action for declaratory judgment that plaintiff and other employes of the city of St. Paul similarly situated are entitled under city ordinance for each year subsequent to 1940 to 15 days’ sick leave occasioned by sickness of the employe or a death in his immediate family.

As we view the case, the legal questions to be decided are: (1) Whether, assuming for purposes of decision, but without so deciding, that a city by ordinance adopted in 1940 granted to unskilled laborers annual sick leave with pay rights and the right to accumulate them, such sick leave with pay rights…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Dodge v. Board of Ed. of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. Indiana Ex Rel. Anderson v. BrandSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Johnson v. State Employees' Retirement Assn.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
  4. Reed v. TrovattenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
  5. Nollet v. HoffmannSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Christensen v. Minneapolis Municipal Employees Retirement BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  2. Sylvestre v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
  3. Harryman v. Roseburg Rural Fire Protection DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Slezak v. OusdigianSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
  5. City of North Little Rock v. VogelgesangSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API