Legal Opinion

Harryman v. Roseburg Rural Fire Protection District

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 10, 1966PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, J.

This is an action to recover the value of unused sick leave accumulated by plaintiff while employed by defendant. Defendant appeals from a judgment in favor of plaintiff.

Plaintiff was employed as a fireman by defendant. His employment was terminated on June 1, 1965, at which time he had accumulated 47 days of sick leave. Defendant refused to pay for the accumulated time on the ground that its sick leave provision allowed compensation only where there was an excused absence from work due to illness, and on the ground that the provision had been revoked prior to plaintiff’s termination of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ramey v. Michigan Public Service CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Adams v. City of ModestoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Halek v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Nilsen v. Oregon State Motor Ass'nOregon Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Oregon State Police Officers' Ass'n v. StateOregon Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Taylor v. Multnomah County Deputy Sheriff's Retirement BoardOregon Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Oregon State Bar v. WrightOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Rose City Transit Co. v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API