Legal Opinion

City of North Little Rock v. Vogelgesang

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided July 20, 1981No. 81-89PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

George Rose Smith, Justice.

This is an action by seven former North Little Rock policemen to recover up to a maximum of 30 days of accumulated sick-leave pay that is assertedly due to each of them. The plaintiffs also seek to maintain the suit as a class action for the benefit of other former policemen. The city defends primarily on the ground that the original ordinance allowing the payment of accumulated sick leave upon the termination of employment was amended in 1976 to exclude employees with less than ten years of service. None of the plaintiffs meet that minimum requirement.

After a…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Dodge v. Board of Ed. of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. Yeazell v. CopinsArizona Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Harryman v. Roseburg Rural Fire Protection DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Lickert v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Brown v. City of Highland ParkMichigan Supreme Court · 1948

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Arkansas Tech University v. LinkSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  2. Fraley v. Williams Ford Tractor & Equipment Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  3. Mega Life and Health Ins. Co. v. JacolaSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  4. Summons v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
  5. ARKANSAS BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD v. HicksSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API