Legal Opinion

Nollet v. Hoffmann

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 4, 1941No. 32,843PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Holt, Justice.

Plaintiff brings this action for a declaratory judgment. Defendant Hoffmann answered separately, to which a demurrer was interposed. From order sustaining the demurrer, Hoffmann appeals.

The pleadings are lengthy and it is not necessary to set out more than enough to show the substance of the controversy. Plaintiff sues in behalf of himself and a class, estimated at 1,000 men, who have worked in the state highway department since January 1, 1938, at an hourly wage, fully paid up to the bringing of the action, and avers that he and those for whom he sues have had no vacation with…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cooke v. IversonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
  2. Berman v. Minnesota State Agricultural SocietySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1904
  3. Wilbrecht v. BabcockSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
  4. State Ex Rel. Birkeland v. ChristiansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
  5. State Ex Rel. Goar v. HoffmannSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dunn v. SchmidSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
  2. Halek v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API