Wyatt v. Wyatt
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BROCK, Chief Judge.
Two questions are presented to this Court for review. First, were there sufficient findings of fact by the trial court on the ability of the plaintiff to meet what the court found to be the needs of the child? Secondly, was the court correct in ordering payment of legal fees without finding as facts that the fees were reasonable and that the plaintiff had refused to provide support which was adequate under the circumstances existing at the time of the institution of the proceeding?
As to the first question, it is well settled in North Carolina that it is the father’s legal…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Austin v. AustinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
- Holt v. HoltCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
- Rickenbaker v. RickenbakerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
- Sawyer v. SawyerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
3Cited by12 opinions
- Bethea v. BetheaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
- Evans v. CraddockCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
- Rogers v. RogersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
- Warner v. LatimerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
- Self v. SelfCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.