Rickenbaker v. Rickenbaker
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
CAMPBELL, Judge.
Once again this Court is forced to point out that Rule 19 of the Rules of Practice in the North Carolina Court of Appeals expressly provides that on appeal the proceedings of the trial court and all documents be set forth in the record in the order of the time in which they occurred. The record in this case did not do this and is incorrect. However, we have decided to reach the merits.
The defendant contends that there was insufficient evidence to support the award. The trial court made findings of fact as to the defendant’s income in 1971 being $103,327.79, with an after-tax…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Rickert v. RickertSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- Sayland Ex Rel. McLendon v. SaylandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- Martin v. MartinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- Sprinkle v. SprinkleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
- Dawson v. . DawsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hill v. JonesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
- Owensby v. OwensbySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
- Wyatt v. WyattCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
- Matter of Baby Boy ScearceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
- Rogers v. RogersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.