Legal Opinion

Self v. Self

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 11, 1978No. 7721DC765PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAUGHN, Judge.

Defendant assigns as error the court’s failure to find that plaintiff’s indignities to him constituted a bar to alimony. G.S. 50-16.5(b) provides that “the fact that the dependent spouse has committed an act or acts which would be grounds for alimony if such spouse were the supporting spouse shall be grounds for disallowance of alimony or reduction in the amount of alimony when pleaded in defense by the supporting spouse” (emphasis added). After the jury found that the plaintiff, without provocation, offered such indignities to the defendant as to render his condition…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Eudy v. EudySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  2. Beall v. BeallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  3. Austin v. AustinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
  4. Wyatt v. WyattCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
  5. Rickenbaker v. RickenbakerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Northampton County Drainage District Number One v. BaileySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  2. Vandiver v. VandiverCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  3. Cornelison v. CornelisonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  4. Skamarak v. SkamarakCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  5. Hill v. HillCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API