Warner v. Latimer
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
VAUGHN, Chief Judge.
Defendant first contends that the child support award did not contain findings of fact and conclusions of law supported by competent evidence demonstrating that the reasonable needs of the child as of the date of the hearing were $500 per month. We disagree.
G.S. 50-13.4(c), the controlling statute, provides:
Payments ordered for the support of a minor child shall be in such amount as to meet the reasonable needs of the child for health, education, and maintenance, having due regard to the estates, earnings, conditions, accustomed standard of living of the child and the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Coble v. CobleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- Williams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- Beall v. BeallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- Williams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- Austin v. AustinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Matter of Baby Boy ScearceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
- Cobb v. CobbCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
- Warner v. LatimerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
- Savani v. SavaniCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
- Appert v. AppertCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.