Legal Opinion

Austin v. Austin

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided September 15, 1971No. 7120DC428PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MALLARD, Chief Judge.

Defendant by assignment of error presents the question: “Did the court err in denying defendant’s motion that Union County be declared an improper venue?” Venue, as used in G.S. Chap. 1, Art. 7, means a place where the trial of a cause may be held by a court with jurisdiction. Lovegrove v. Lovegrove, 237 N.C. 307, 74 S.E. 2d 723 (1953). Jurisdiction is the power of a court to hear and decide a legal controversy. McIntosh, N. C. Practice 2d, § 5. There is a fundamental procedural distinction between a trial on the merits and the hearing of a motion in the cause. This…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Crosby v. CrosbySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  2. Eason v. SpenceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  3. Swicegood v. SwicegoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  4. Peoples v. PeoplesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
  5. Graham v. . FloydSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Morris v. BaileyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  2. Falls v. FallsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  3. Peace River Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. Ward Transformer Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
  4. Hill v. JonesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
  5. Stroupe v. StroupeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API