Evans v. Craddock
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ARNOLD, Judge.
Defendant’s Appeal
The defendant first attacks the reasonableness of the trial court’s award. G.S. 5043.4(c) states the standard for setting the amount of child support:
Payments ordered for the support of a minor child shall be in such amount as to meet the reasonable needs of the child for health, education, and maintenance, having due regard to the estates, earnings, conditions, accustomed standard of living of the child and the parties, the child care and homemaker contributions of each party, and other facts of the particular case.
The conclusions of the court must
“be based…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Coble v. CobleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- Crosby v. CrosbySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Eudy v. EudySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- Hudson v. HudsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- Vernon v. CristSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Goold v. GooldConnecticut Appellate Court · 1987
- Tyson v. Ciba-Geigy Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
- Dixon v. DixonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
- Peed v. PeedCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- Warner v. LatimerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.