Maria Volodina Cheshire v. Bank of America
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Non-Argument Calendar.
1Per curiam
Maria Volodina Cheshire, proceeding pro se, appeals the district court’s order dismissing her civil complaint (“Complaint”) against defendants Bank of America and Kenneth D. Lewis (collectively “Defendants”). The district court concluded that (1) the Complaint failed to state a claim upon which relief can be granted and (2) the claims were barred by applicable statutes of limitations. The district court also dismissed the Complaint as a sanction against Cheshire for filing a unilateral settlement agreement and failing to appear at the motion to dismiss hearing.
On appeal, Cheshire argues that…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Chudasama v. Mazda Motor Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
- Timson v. SampsonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
- Weil v. NearySupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- William Dwayne Young v. City of Palm BayCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
- William H. Garvie v. City of Fort Walton BeachCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
3Cited by11 opinions
- Royal Bahamian Ass'n, Inc. v. Qbe Ins. Corp.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2010
- (PS) Allen v. City of Citrus Heights Police Dept.District Court, E.D. California · 2021
- (PS) Callum v. Austin Capital BankDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
- Camille v. MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, MDCRDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2025
- Carey v. Trans Union, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2022
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.