Legal Opinion

(PS) Callum v. Austin Capital Bank

District Court, E.D. California

Decided October 6, 2021No. 2:21-cv-01484Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 GARLAND CALLUM, No. 2:21-cv-01484-JAM-CKD PS 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 AUSTIN CAPITAL BANK, (ECF No. 6) 15 Defendant. 16 17 Presently before the court is a motion by defendant Austin Capital Bank (“ACB”) to 18 dismiss plaintiff’s complaint for failure to state a claim under Rule 12(b)(6), or in the alternative 19 for a more definite statement of the claim under Rule 12(e).1 (ECF No. 6.) Plaintiff failed to file 20 any opposition or statement of non-opposition, and the motion was taken under…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
  3. Hebbe v. PlilerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  4. McHenry v. RenneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  5. Paulsen v. CNF INC.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API