Timson v. Sampson
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Non-Argument Calendar.
1Per curiam
John Timson, proceeding pro se, appeals the district court’s dismissal of his pro se qui tarn action under the FCA, 31 U.S.C. §§ 3729-3733. Timson makes two arguments on appeal. First, he argues that the district court erred in dismissing his complaint because, as a pro se relator, he was unable to maintain a qui tam action under the FCA. Second, he argues that the district court abused its discretion in declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over his state law claims. For the reasons set forth more fully below, we affirm.
As an initial matter, Timson also appeals the stay of his…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Neal Horsley v. Gloria FeldtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
- United States Ex Rel. Clausen v. Laboratory Corp. of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
- Stoner v. Santa Clara County Office of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Geneba Glover v. Philip MorrisCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2006
- Ragsdale v. Rubbermaid, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by630 opinions
- David Sapuppo, Theresa Sapuppo v. Allstate Floridian Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2014
- United States Ex Rel. Mergent Services v. FlahertyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
- James Edward Hoefling, Jr. v. City of MiamiCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2016
- Adam Keith Waldman v. Alabama Prison CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2017
- Avis K. Hornsby-Culpepper v. R. David WareCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2018
625 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.