Legal Opinion
Weil v. Neary
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided January 2, 1929No. 59PublishedCited by 199 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Taft
In May, 1921, Neary, a citizen of New York — assignee of Samuel Untermyer and acting for him — brought suit in the Supreme Court of that State for more than $70,000, against A. Leo Weil and Charles M. Thorp, citizens of Pennsylvania. The defendants removed the cause to the District Court for the Southern District of New York, on the ground of diverse citizenship. In oral argument it was conceded that Untermyer is the real party in interest as plaintiff, so we shall hereinafter refer to him as such.
By his complaint, amended by leave of court to conform to the evidence, Untermyer alleged that…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Oscanyan v. Arms Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Hobbs v. McLeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railway Co. v. VoigtSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Tool Co. v. NorrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1865
- Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by199 opinions
- Woods v. City Nat. Bank & Trust Co. of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Roy A. Somlyo v. J. Lu-Rob Enterprises, Inc. And Louis G. BondCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- Hollingsworth v. PerrySupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Smolowe v. Delendo CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
- Wolf v. WeinsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
194 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.