Legal Opinion
William Dwayne Young v. City of Palm Bay
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided February 2, 2004No. 02-16154PublishedCited by 177 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EDMONDSON, Chief Judge:
Plaintiff-appellant William D. Young appeals the district court’s order granting defendants’ motions for summary judgment on all counts. After four extensions of time, plaintiffs counsel still failed to submit timely memoranda in opposition to the motions. The district court refused to grant a fifth extension of time or to accept plaintiffs untimely filings. After a thorough review of defendants’ motions and supporting affidavits and of the record properly before it, the district court concluded that defendants were entitled to summary judgment. We affirm.
I
We review a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Pioneer Investment Services Co. v. Brunswick Associates Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Allen v. Tyson Foods, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
- Will v. Calvert Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Information Systems and Networks Corp. v. The City of Atlanta, Herbert L. McCallCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by177 opinions
- Walter Melton v. David AbstonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2016
- Fils v. City of AventuraCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
- Danny M. Bennett v. Dennis Lee HendrixCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
- Kernel Records Oy v. Timothy Z. MosleyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2012
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. Joseph J. MonterossoCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2014
172 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.