Legal Opinion
(PS) Allen v. City of Citrus Heights Police Dept.
District Court, E.D. California
Decided July 30, 2021No. 2:20-cv-01853Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CRAIG DOUGLAS ALLEN, No. 2:20–cv–1853–JAM–KJN PS 12 Plaintiff, ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT 13 v. (ECF Nos. 13, 17.) 14 CITRUS HEIGHTS POLICE DEPT., et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff filed a complaint and paid the filing fee. (ECF Nos. 1, 10, 11.) Defendant Citrus 18 Heights Police Department filed a motion for a more definite statement under Rule 12(e);1 19 plaintiff opposed and requested early discovery. (ECF Nos. 13, 15, 17.) 20 Defendant’s Rule 12(e) motion is…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Michael Lacey v. Joseph ArpaioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- McHenry v. RenneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Mark S. Allen v. Gold Country Casino the Berry Creek Rancheria of Tyme Maidu Indians Mattie MayhewCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Nurre v. WhiteheadCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.