Legal Opinion
William H. Garvie v. City of Fort Walton Beach
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided April 20, 2004No. 03-10886PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TJOFLAT, Circuit Judge:
Plaintiffs William and Martha Garvie claim that they own a piece of land the City of Fort Walton Beach (“the City”) unconstitutionally paved over with asphalt. DB Daughters Corp., another plaintiff, claims that it owned land adjacent to the Garvies of which the City also illegally took ownership. All three purported landowners 1 sued under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, claiming that the City had violated the Public Use Clause requirement of the Takings Clause, see U.S. Const amend V. (“[N]or shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.” (emphasis…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Jerberee Jefferson v. Sewon America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2018
- Yeyille v. Miami Dade County Public SchoolsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2016
- Kloss v. RBS Citizens, N.A.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2014
- City of Steamboat Springs v. JohnsonColorado Court of Appeals · 2010
- Maria Volodina Cheshire v. Bank of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2009
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.