Metropolitan Water District v. Adams
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.
This is an appeal from a portion of a judgment directing that petitioners be paid specified sums of money, without interest, out of money held by the County Treasurer of the county of Riverside, and from an order refusing to vacate that judgment. The money had its source in that paid by the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California for condemnation of various parcels of land for a reservoir in Riverside County.
The parties agree that the various amounts ordered paid to petitioners are correct as to the principal. The only question before us is whether or not petitioners are entitled…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Silvers v. GrossmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Bennett v. PotterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Stoddard v. TreadwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
- Peak v. Republic Truck Sales Corp.California Supreme Court · 1924
- Beltaire v. George Rosenberg & SonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Joslin v. GertzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957