Legal Opinion
Dean v. Kuchel
California Supreme Court
Decided May 18, 1950No. Sac. 6106PublishedCited by 52 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCarter, J.
The controversy here presented involves the validity of a transaction between the state and Pacific- Southwestern Company, a partnership. In 1949 the Legislature passed a statute reading: “Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Director of Finance, with the consent of any state agency having jurisdiction thereof, is hereby authorized and empowered to let to any person, firm or corporation, for a term not to exceed forty years any real property which belongs to the State, regardless of whether such property was acquired under any law specifying that such property was to be devoted to…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- McBean v. City of FresnoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- City of Grass Valley v. WalkinshawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Higgins v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- City of Whittier v. DixonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- City of Los Angeles v. OffnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- McArthur v. SmallwoodSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1955
- Rider v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- County of Sacramento v. Assessment Appeals Board No. 2California Court of Appeal · 1973
- United Airlines, Inc. v. Hsbc Bank Usa, N.A., as Trustee, and California Statewide Communities Development AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
- Clayton v. KervickSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1968
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.