Legal Opinion

Rice v. McAlister

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 7, 1974PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHowell, J.

This is an action for fraud. The trial court, sitting without a jury, entered findings and a judgment for plaintiffs for general and punitive damages, and defendant McAlister appeals. ①

The genesis of this action occurred prior to February, 1969, when the plaintiffs engaged the Kimberly-Jay Corporation to construct a residence for them in Gladstone. The defendant McAlister was president of the corporation. Plaintiffs were dissatisfied with Kimberly-Jay Corporation’s performance and filed an action against the corporation and three of its officers, including McAlister, as individual defendants.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Conzelmann v. Northwest Poultry & Dairy Products Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1950

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Webb v. ClarkOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  2. McDonald v. Sun Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  3. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HockettOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  4. State Ex Rel. Redden v. Discount Fabrics, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Wilcox v. First Interstate Bank of Oregon, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API