Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re Conduct of Barber

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 26, 1995No. OSB 92-104; SC S41694PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

In this lawyer disciplinary proceeding, the Oregon State Bar filed a formal complaint against the accused, alleging that he had violated several provisions of the Code of Professional Responsibility and a state statute governing lawyer discipline. A trial panel of the Disciplinary Board ordered that he be suspended from the practice of law for three years. Under ORS 9.536(2) and BR 10.1, review by this court is automatic. We review the record de novo, ORS 9.536(3); BR 10.6, find the accused guilty of all the charges and disbar him.

We find the following facts from the evidence in the record.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of SamuelsOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of AltstattOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  3. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of GreshamOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  4. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of TaylorOregon Supreme Court · 1994

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of DavenportOregon Supreme Court · 2002
  2. In Re BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1998
  3. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of EllisOregon Supreme Court · 2015
  4. In re ArdOregon Supreme Court · 2021
  5. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of CobbOregon Supreme Court · 2008

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API