Legal Opinion
Fedus v. Planning & Zoning Commission
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided June 27, 2006No. SC 17375PublishedCited by 47 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PALMER, J.
The dispositive issue raised by this appeal is whether the failure to name the clerk of the municipality in the citation of a zoning appeal brought pursuant to General Statutes (Rev. to 2001) § 8-8 (b) and (f), as amended by Public Acts 2001, No. 01-47, § 1 (P.A. 01-47), 1 deprives the court of subject matter jurisdiction over the appeal. The plaintiffs, John Fedus, Mae Fedus, Rose Fedus, Alyce Daggett and Steven Fedus, Jr., appeal from the judgment of the trial court dismissing their appeal from the decision of the defendant, the planning and zoning commission of the town of…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Jolly, Inc. v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Simko v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Schwartz v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Amodio v. AmodioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Tolly v. Department of Human ResourcesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Stone-Krete Construction, Inc. v. EderSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Cruz v. MontanezSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- McCoy v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
- Fort Trumbull Conservancy, LLC v. City of New LondonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- American Promotional Events, Inc. v. BlumenthalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.