Legal Opinion
Red Rooster Construction Co. v. River Associates, Inc.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided February 9, 1993No. 14403PublishedCited by 49 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBorden, J.
This appeal arises from an action brought by the plaintiff, Red Rooster Construction Company (Red Rooster), to foreclose a mechanic’s lien on the property of the defendant River Associates, Inc. The plaintiff appeals1 from the judgment of the trial court rendered in favor of the defendants River Associates, Inc. (River Associates), Connecticut Savings Bank (bank), and Connecticut Attorney’s Title Insurance Company (title company). The trial court concluded that the plaintiff’s mechanic’s lien was invalid.
Red Rooster claims that the trial court improperly concluded that: (1) the bank, as a…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Connecticut v. DoehrSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Coleman v. Conservation Society of Southern Vermont, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- In re Valerie D.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- State v. BittingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
- Walton v. Town of New HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Rivera v. Double A Transportation, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Tolly v. Department of Human ResourcesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Eldridge v. EldridgeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Gem Plumbing & Heating Co., Inc. v. RossiSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2005
- Ferrigno v. Cromwell Development AssociatesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.