Legal Opinion
Ravetto v. Triton Thalassic Technologies, Inc.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided March 4, 2008No. SC 17792PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
VERTEFEUILLE, J.
This consolidated appeal1 arises out of separate actions2 brought by the plaintiffs, W. Frederick Ravetto and Raymond Bartko, former employees3 of the named defendant, Triton Thalassic Technologies, Inc. (Triton), wherein the plaintiffs alleged that Triton and the defendant Barry Ressler4 had failed to pay them wages in accordance with the provisions of General Statutes §§ 31-71ato 31-7H, inclusive. Pursuant to General Statutes § 31-72,5 the plaintiffs *720sought to recover the unpaid wages, double damages, costs, interest and attorney’s fees. Bartko also sought damages…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- National Collegiate Athletic Ass'n v. Board of Regents of the University of OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Williams Ford, Inc. v. Hartford Courant Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Schoonmaker v. Lawrence Brunoli, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- State v. LawrenceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Cweklinsky v. Mobil Chemical Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Perez-Dickson v. City of BridgeportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2012
- Association Resources, Inc. v. WallSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Remillard v. RemillardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Geysen v. Securitas Security Services USA, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2016
- Saunders v. FirtelSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.