Legal Opinion
Kaczynski v. Kaczynski
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided November 10, 2009No. SC 18235PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ROGERS, C. J.
Our resolution of this appeal makes clear that when a trial court opinion is silent as to the standard of proof applied, an appellate court is not the proper forum to first raise a claim that the trial court applied the wrong standard when that claim could have been raised in, and more fairly remedied by, a motion for articulation or reargument. The plaintiff, Bemadetta Kaczynski, appeals following our grant of certification 1 from the judgment of the Appellate Court reversing the trial court’s judgment dissolving her marriage to the defendant, Dariusz Kaczynski. See…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- State v. DavisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Lopinto v. HainesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Kavarco v. T. J. E., Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1984
- In re Juvenile Appeal (84-AB)Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Stuart v. StuartSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Rafalko v. University of New HavenConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
- Brown v. OtakeConnecticut Appellate Court · 2016
- BNY Western Trust v. RomanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Wall Systems, Inc. v. PompaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2017
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.