Rowe v. . Rowe-Coward Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtClaeKSON, J.
The first question presented: “Did the filing of a counterclaim in an action at law brought by a third party against the employee bar the employee from later proceeding under the Workmen’s Compensation Act when the judgment on counterclaim was unfavorable to the employee?” We think not, under the facts and circumstances of this case.
N. 0. Code 1931 (Michie), sec. 8081 (r), (Public Laws 1929, ch. 120, sec. 11) in part is as follows: “The rights and remedies herein granted to an employee where be and bis employer have accepted the provisions of this chapter, respectively, to pay and accept…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Brown v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
- Chambers v. . Oil CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
- West v. East Coast Fertilizer Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
- Michaux v. Gate City Orange Crush Bottling Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
- Phifer v. . BerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Hanks v. Southern Public Utilities Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
- Hartley v. North Carolina Prison DepartmentSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- Archie v. . Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
- Hirsch v. Hirsch Bros.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1952
- Curran v. Security Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1961
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.