Legal Opinion

Michaux v. Gate City Orange Crush Bottling Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 24, 1934PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBhogdeN, J.

The claimant was employed as a truck helper by the driver thereof, with the consent and approval of the employer, Gate City Orange Crush Bottling Company. Moreover, bis services were necessary to the proper and efficient distribution of the products of the employer. He was injured in attempting to climb upon the truck to which he had been assigned in the prosecution of the business of the owner. Hayes v. Creamery, 195 N. C., 313, 141 S. E., 340.

Assuming that it was a negligent act for this boy to attempt to mount a moving truck, nevertheless “it is generally conceded by all courts that the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Chambers v. . Oil CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  2. Hayes v. Pine State CreamerySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  3. Quarles v. O. B. Taylor & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1928

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Lemmerman v. A. T. Williams Oil Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  2. Beach v. . McLeanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  3. Brewer v. POWERS TRUCKING COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  4. Hartley v. North Carolina Prison DepartmentSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  5. Nolde Bros. v. ChalkleySupreme Court of Virginia · 1945

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API