Chambers v. . Oil Company
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBeogdeN, J.
Two questions of law are presented for decision:
First, did the injury to plaintiff arise out of and in the course of the employment ?
Second, if the injury was the result of horse-play, is the plaintiff entitled to compensation?
The first question of law involves a construction of section 2(f) of the Compensation Act. The section reads as follows: “Injury and personal injury shall mean only injury by accident arising out of and in the course of employment and shall not include disease in any form, except where it results naturally and unavoidably from the accident.”
The record in the case at bar…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Matter of Leonbruno v. . Champlain Silk MillsNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
3Cited by40 opinions
- Pacific Employers Insurance v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Lockey v. . Cohen, Goldman Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
- Wilson v. . MooresvilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- Hegler v. Cannon Mills Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
- Plemmons v. . White's Service, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.