Hirsch v. Hirsch Bros.

The defendants’ exceptions present the question of whether at the time of the accident on June 30, 1951, Carl and *483Albert Hirsch could be found to have been acting as “employees” of the insured corporation within the meaning of the Workmen’s Compensation Law. The statutory definition of “employee,” so far as pertinent, is as follows: “Employee, shall mean any person in the service of an employer subject to the provisions of this chapter under any contract of hire, express or implied, oral or written . . . .” Laws 1947, c. 266, s. 2 II.

The defendants contend that the evidence required a finding…