West v. East Coast Fertilizer Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtClakksoN, J.
On the hearing before the full Commission, we find: “The full Commission has carefully reviewed the evidence in this case and we are of the opinion that the claimants are entitled to recover and the full Commission adopts as its own the findings of fact, conclusions of law and award of the hearing Commissioner and directs that compensation in this case be paid by the defendants.”
The finding of fact by the hearing Commissioner, adopted by the full Commission, is as follows: “On 5 July, 1930, Charles Henry West, while regularly employed by the East Coast Fertilizer Company, at an average weekly…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Matter of Heidemann v. . Am. District Tel. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1921
3Cited by23 opinions
- McGill v. Town of LumbertonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
- Hildebrand v. . Furniture Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
- Smith v. Cabarrus Creamery Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Wilson v. . MooresvilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- Hildebrand v. McDowell Furniture Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.