Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Archie v. . Lumber Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 8, 1943PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partSchenck, J.

This was a proceeding under the Workmen's Compensation Act to obtain compensation for the injury and death of Willie C. Archie, an employee of the defendant Lumber Company. It was not controverted that both the employee and the employer were subject to the provisions of the Act, and that the claimants were the only dependents of the employee.

The hearing Commissioner denied compensation. On review by the Full Commission a contrary conclusion was reached and compensation awarded. On appeal to the Superior Court the trial judge held that, on the facts found by the Industrial Commission, the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hawkins v. BleaklySupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  2. Chambers v. . Oil CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  3. Tindall v. American Furniture Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  4. Bellamy v. Great Falls Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  5. Dependents of Phifer v. Foremost Dairy, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1930

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Allred v. Allred-Gardner, IncorporatedSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  2. Bye v. Interstate Granite Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  3. Hoyle v. Isenhour Brick & Tile Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  4. Fox v. Cramerton Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  5. Hartley v. North Carolina Prison DepartmentSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API