Legal Opinion

Blodgett v. Rheinschild

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 6, 1922No. Civ. No. 3525PublishedCited by 32 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtFinlayson, P. J.

This is an appeal by plaintiff from the judgment in an action brought by him to recover possession of an automobile. The case comes to us on the judgment-roll only. The action, commenced on May 6, 1919, was originally brought in the name of J. L. Blodgett; subsequently, as shown by a supplemental complaint, the J. L. Blodgett Company, a corporation, succeeded to all of the rights of the original plaintiff; but this notwithstanding, it will conduce to brevity if we discuss the case as though there had been no such change of interest.

The complaint alleges that on February 18, 1919, plaintiff…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Bearss v. FordIllinois Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Bradbury v. DavenportCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Schrandt v. YoungNebraska Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Loughborough v. McNevinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  5. In re the Estate of RoseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Haines v. Commercial Mortgage Co.California Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Wallace v. ZinmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Burr v. Capital Reserve Corp.California Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Epstein v. FrankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
  5. Gem-Valley Ranches, Inc. v. SmallIdaho Supreme Court · 1966

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API