Jackson v. Shawl
California Supreme Court
Appeal from the District Court, Fifteenth Judicial District, City and County of San Francisco. The defendant appealed from the judgment. The other facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court, Currey, J.
This is an action of replevin in the detinet for a gold watch, two diamond rings and two diamond pins, the property of the plaintiff, of. the value of nine hundred and fifty dollars. On the 21st of August, 1864, the defendant loaned to plaintiff five hundred dollars, in consideration of which the latter promised to pay the former one month thereafter said sum with interest thereon at the rate of seven per cent per month; and to secure the payment of the principal and interest, the plaintiff delivered to the defendant, who was a pawnbroker, the property above mentioned,…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- President of the Bank of the United States v. OwensSupreme Court of the United States · 1829
- Pratt v. AdamsNew York Court of Chancery · 1839
- Hi-Voltage Wire Works, Inc. v. City of San JoseCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
- People ex rel. Smith v. Judge of the Twelfth DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861
- De Groot v. Van DuzerNew York Supreme Court · 1838
3Cited by31 opinions
- Carter v. Seaboard Finance Co.California Supreme Court · 1949
- Haines v. Commercial Mortgage Co.California Supreme Court · 1927
- Birbrower, Montalbano, Condon & Frank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- Levinson v. BoasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- In Re FullerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.