Legal Opinion

Chicago Pneumatic Tool Co. v. McGrew

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 15, 1936No. 26893PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an original proceeding in this court brought by the Chicago Pneumatic Tool Company and its insurance carrier, as petitioners, to obtain a review of an award made by the State Industrial Commission in favor of R. E. McGrew. The parties will hereafter be referred to as petitioners and respondent.

The record discloses that the petitioner Chicago Pneumatic Tool Company was manufacturer and distributor of well drilling equipment and had an office and repair shop at Oklahoma City and a storeroom at We-woka; that the respondent was a combination salesman and service man in the employ of said…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. McKeever Drilling Co. v. EgbertSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  2. Indian Territory Illuminating Oil Co. v. LewisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  3. Consolidated Pipe Line Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  4. Lucky-Kidd Mining Co. v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  5. Harris v. Oklahoma Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Smith v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  2. McGeorge Corp. v. State Industrial Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  3. Chatham v. Arrow Drilling Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  4. State Highway Commission v. KoonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  5. City of Tulsa v. MorrisonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API