Legal Opinion

Consolidated Pipe Line Co. v. Mahon

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 6, 1931No. 21951PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSwindall, J.

On August 22, 1930, C. A. Mahon was engaged in a hazardous employment with the Consolidated Pipe Line Company in the capacity of a “pipeliner,” and on- said date his employment required him to be eight miles north of Wewoka where he and his associates were engaged in tak ing up a four-inch pipe line. Shortly before noon a rain storm came up and Mahon together with some of 'his associates took refuge in an old house described by him as an old, dilapidated, frame house with a floor, and the windows and doors were removed and there had been cattle and “stuff” in there and it looked like no one…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Von Ette's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
  2. Haller v. City of LansingMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
  3. State ex rel. Peoples Coal & Ice Co. v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
  4. De Luca v. Board of Park CommissionersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1919
  5. State ex rel. Virginia & Rainy Lake Co. v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Stanolind Pipe Line Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  2. Indian Territory Illuminating Oil Co. v. LewisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  3. Gulf Oil Corporation v. GarrisonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  4. Smith v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  5. Crutchfield v. BogleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API