Consolidated Pipe Line Co. v. Mahon
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtSwindall, J.
On August 22, 1930, C. A. Mahon was engaged in a hazardous employment with the Consolidated Pipe Line Company in the capacity of a “pipeliner,” and on- said date his employment required him to be eight miles north of Wewoka where he and his associates were engaged in tak ing up a four-inch pipe line. Shortly before noon a rain storm came up and Mahon together with some of 'his associates took refuge in an old house described by him as an old, dilapidated, frame house with a floor, and the windows and doors were removed and there had been cattle and “stuff” in there and it looked like no one…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Von Ette's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
- Haller v. City of LansingMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
- State ex rel. Peoples Coal & Ice Co. v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
- De Luca v. Board of Park CommissionersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1919
- State ex rel. Virginia & Rainy Lake Co. v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Stanolind Pipe Line Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Indian Territory Illuminating Oil Co. v. LewisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- Gulf Oil Corporation v. GarrisonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- Smith v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- Crutchfield v. BogleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.