Legal Opinion
City of Tulsa v. Morrison
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided June 25, 1957No. 37527PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CARLILE, Justice.
On March 10, 1956, Robert Morrison, respondent herein, filed a claim for compensation against the City of Tulsa and its insurance carrier, State Insurance Fund, petitioners herein, in which he states that on February 4, 1956, while in the employment of the City of Tulsa he sustained an accidental injury consisting of a broken ankle; that the injury occurred when he slipped and fell against a door sill; that at the time he sustained the injury he was employed as a helper on a city garbage truck.
The trial commissioner found that on the 4th day of February, 1956 respondent,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Novak v. McAlisterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
- Folsom Auto Supply v. BristowSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
- Greenway v. National Gypsum CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
- Chicago Pneumatic Tool Co. v. McGrewSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
3Cited by7 opinions
- Richey v. Commander Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1974
- Max E. Landry, Inc. v. TreadwaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
- Hegwood v. PittmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970
- Sweet v. KoloskySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
- F. W. A. Drilling Co. v. UlerySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1973
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.