Legal Opinion
Indian Territory Illuminating Oil Co. v. Lewis
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided June 13, 1933No. 23458PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWelch, J.
This is an original proceeding to review an award of the State Industrial Commission, wherein the employer and insurance carrier are petitioners, and the claimant and State Industrial Commission are respondents.
On December 31, 1930, the respondent, while employed by petitioner as an “oil switcher,” his duties being that of gauging the flow of oil from producing wells on the lease belonging to petitioner and seeing that the oil went into the tanks and that the wells were making what they should, and that everything was all right on the lease. While he was engaged in the performance of such…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Oklahoma-Arkansas Tel. Co. v. FriesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- Associated Employers' Reciprocal v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Consolidated Pipe Line Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- Farmers Gin Co. v. CooperSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
- Drumbight Feed Co. v. HuntSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Stanolind Pipe Line Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- McMillin v. Barton-Robison Convoy Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- Mullins v. TankslearySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
- Oklahoma Gas & Electric Co. v. StoutSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- Anderson v. Bills Bakeries, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.