Legal Opinion
Chatham v. Arrow Drilling Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided March 8, 1938No. 27720PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDavison, J.
This is an original proceeding to review an order of the State Industrial Commission denying an award to- the petitioner.
The Industrial Commission found that the evidence is not sufficient to show that the accident occurred while claimant was employed in a hazardous occupation as defined by the Workmen’s Compensation Law of- the state of Oklahoma: that the commission was without jurisdiction, and that the claim for compensation should be denied.
The respondent Arrow Drilling Company was, at the time of the accident complained of. engaged in the occupation and business of drilling contractor.…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- McKeever Drilling Co. v. EgbertSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Wilson Co., Inc. v. MusgraveSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- Harris v. Oklahoma Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Pemberton Bakery v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- Mashburn v. City of GrandfieldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Amerada Petroleum Corp. v. VaughanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948
- Briscoe Construction Co. v. MillerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- Chickasha Cotton Oil Co. v. StrangeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
- Burrows v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
- E. M. Mildred Agency v. YatesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.