Legal Opinion

State v. Story

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided August 26, 2003No. 1 CA-CR 02-0363PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GEMMILL, Judge.

¶ 1 Gary Story appeals his convictions and sentences on one count of possession of dangerous drugs and one count of possession of drug paraphernalia. He argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress the evidence seized from his van and also committed errors while sentencing him under Proposition 200. 1 Because only our resolution of the Proposition 200 sentencing issues merits publication, we have addressed and affirmed the trial court’s suppression ruling in a separate memorandum decision. See Ariz. R. Sup.Ct. 111(h); Ariz. R.Crim. P. 31.26; State…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Calik v. KongableArizona Supreme Court · 1999
  2. State v. EstradaArizona Supreme Court · 2001
  3. State v. FellCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
  4. In Re Shane B.Arizona Supreme Court · 2000
  5. State v. CidCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1995

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. PayneCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
  2. State v. MangumCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  3. Raney v. LindbergCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
  4. State v. RomeroCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  5. State v. ReinhardtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API