State v. Reinhardt
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GEMMILL, Judge.
¶ 1 In 1996, Arizona voters enacted the Drug Medicalization, Prevention, and Control Act, commonly referred to as Proposition 200, which is codified primarily in Arizona Revised Statutes (“A.R.S.”) section 13-901.01 (2001). Charles Edward Reinhardt was convicted of three drug offenses that occurred simultaneously in 2001: possession of a dangerous drug (methamphetamine), possession of marijuana, and possession of drug paraphernalia. These offenses are subject to the provisions of Proposition 200. Although this was Reinhardt’s first “time” to be convicted of such drug…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Calik v. KongableArizona Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. EstradaArizona Supreme Court · 2001
- Fisher v. Maricopa County Stadium DistrictCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
- State v. StoryCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
- State v. GallagherCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
3Cited by2 opinions
- State of Arizona v. Linda Ann SiplivyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
- State v. GomezCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004