State v. Romero
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ESPINOSA, Judge.
¶ 1 After pleading guilty, petitioner Alejandro Romero was convicted of promoting prison contraband, a class two felony, and sentenced to a presumptive term of five years in prison. Romero filed a notice of post-conviction relief pursuant to Rule 32, Ariz. R.Crim. P., 17 A.R.S., and in his petition for post-conviction relief argued his sentence was illegal. Romero, who is an inmate at the Arizona Department of Corrections, maintained he was eligible for mandatory probation, pursuant to A.R.S. § 13-901.01, because the contraband discovered in his possession was…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Larson v. FarleyArizona Supreme Court · 1970
- State v. WallArizona Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. EstradaArizona Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. BennettArizona Supreme Court · 2006
- Castillo v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1974
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State of Arizona v. Joseph Michael GoddardCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
- State v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2018
- State v. GoddardCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011