Legal Opinion

State v. Romero

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided July 30, 2007No. 2 CA-CR 2007-0075-PRPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ESPINOSA, Judge.

¶ 1 After pleading guilty, petitioner Alejandro Romero was convicted of promoting prison contraband, a class two felony, and sentenced to a presumptive term of five years in prison. Romero filed a notice of post-conviction relief pursuant to Rule 32, Ariz. R.Crim. P., 17 A.R.S., and in his petition for post-conviction relief argued his sentence was illegal. Romero, who is an inmate at the Arizona Department of Corrections, maintained he was eligible for mandatory probation, pursuant to A.R.S. § 13-901.01, because the contraband discovered in his possession was…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Larson v. FarleyArizona Supreme Court · 1970
  2. State v. WallArizona Supreme Court · 2006
  3. State v. EstradaArizona Supreme Court · 2001
  4. State v. BennettArizona Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Castillo v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1974

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State of Arizona v. Joseph Michael GoddardCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
  2. State v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2018
  3. State v. GoddardCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API