Legal Opinion

In Re Shane B.

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided July 27, 2000No. CV-98-0422-PRPublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JONES, Vice Chief Justice.

¶ 1 Petitioner Shane B., a juvenile, argues that the juvenile court erred in designating him a “first time felony juvenile offender” and in issuing a “first time felony juvenile offender” warning pursuant to A.R.S. § 8-341, 1 a statute which took effect after the date of his offenses. The court of appeals analyzed the case under the ex post facto provisions of the federal and state constitutions, concluding that the designation and warning have no punitive consequence and that the statute’s retroactive application does not violate ex post facto principles.…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Kent v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Calder v. BullSupreme Court of the United States · 1798
  3. Breed v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. State v. NobleArizona Supreme Court · 1992
  5. United States v. Jerome T. BlandCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Seisinger v. SiebelArizona Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Aranda v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Garcia v. BrowningArizona Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Jacobs v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Hall v. Elected Officials' Retirement PlanArizona Supreme Court · 2016

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API