Legal Opinion

Mulcahy v. Baldwin

California Supreme Court

Decided October 14, 1932No. Docket No. S.F. 14701PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.

Mandamus to compel the respondent, as secretary of the hoard of directors of the Nevada Irrigation District, to countersign refunding bonds of the district.

The Nevada Irrigation District was formed and came into existence on August 17, 1925, under the California Irrigation District Act (Stats. 1897, p. 254, as amended). The district is located in the foothill regions of Nevada and Placer Counties and comprises approximately 267,000 acres of land. Of this acreage only 8,000 acres are under irrigation and only about 4,000 acres are being served from the district’s works.

In 1925 a first issue of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Merchants National Bank v. Escondido Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  2. La Mesa, Lemon Grove & Spring Valley Irrigation District v. HalleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Palo Verde Irrigation District v. SeeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Carpenter v. Pacific Mutual Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  2. May v. Board of DirectorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Provident Land Corp. v. ZumwaltCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Hershey v. ColeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  5. County of Los Angeles v. RockholdCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API