Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Palo Verde Irrigation District v. Seeley

California Supreme Court

Decided April 22, 1926No. Docket No. S.F. 11864PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLennon, J.

Mandate to compel the respondent, as secretary of the board of trustees of Palo Verde Irrigation District, to sign $213,000 of refunding bonds, designated as “Second Issue” of said Palo Verde Irrigation District, which were voted upon at an election held in said irrigation district on August 28, 1925.

The Palo Verde Irrigation District was organized in 1923 under an act known as “Palo Verde Irrigation District Act” (Stats. 1923, p. 1067), for the purpose of taking over the properties and functions of three separate and independent agencies theretofore operating in the Palo Verde Valley and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Chapman v. Sacramento Drainage Dist.California Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Tarpey v. McClureCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Barber v. GallowayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Reclamation Dist. No. 70 v. BirksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  5. La Mesa, Lemon Grove & Spring Valley Irrigation District v. HalleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. County of San Diego v. HammondCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  2. County of San Diego v. ChildsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Hershey v. ColeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  4. County of Los Angeles v. RockholdCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  5. County of Los Angeles v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API