Legal Opinion
County of Los Angeles v. Rockhold
California Supreme Court
Decided April 17, 1935No. L. A. 14798PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
This is a petition for a writ of mandate to compel the respondent County Surveyor of Los Angeles County to prepare a diagram and make a reassessment for the refunding of bonds of Acquisition and Improvement District No. 67 in said county. The refunding proceedings were instituted in accordance with the provisions of the “Re funding Special Assessment Bond Act of 1933” (Stats. 1933, chap. 749). The purpose of the proceeding is to test the constitutionality of that statute.
A brief review of the legislative and economic background of this case is necessary to a complete understanding…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Home Building & Loan Assn. v. BlaisdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- W. B. Worthen Co. v. KavanaughSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- W. B. Worthen Co. v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Chapman v. JocelynCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Merrill v. DearingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Loew's Inc. v. ByramCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- County of San Diego v. HammondCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Mercury Herald Co. v. MooreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Solvang Municipal Improvement District v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- Anglo California National Bank of San Francisco v. LelandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.