Legal Opinion

Nieting v. Blondell

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 31, 1975No. 45361PublishedCited by 106 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MacLaughlin, Justice.

Defendants appeal from an order of the district court dismissing their third-party complaint against the State of Minnesota on the ground that the state is immune from suit. For reasons stated herein we affirm as to this case, but establish a new rule of law in Minnesota for cases arising on and after August 1, 1976.

This case arises from a multiple-vehicle collision involving a tractor-trailer unit and seven automobiles on Interstate Highway No. 94 (1-94) near Victoria Street in St. Paul, Minnesota, on April 6, 1972. The tractor-trailer unit had traveled through the…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Molitor v. Kaneland Community Unit District No. 302Illinois Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Muskopf v. Corning Hospital DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Ayala v. Philadelphia Board of Public EducationSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  4. Holytz v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Stone v. Arizona Highway CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1963

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by106 opinions

  1. Wichita Falls State Hospital v. TaylorTexas Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Pruett v. City of RosedaleMississippi Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Rico v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
  4. McCall v. BatsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1985
  5. Nusbaum v. County of Blue EarthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988

101 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API